Sujet : Re: smrproxy v2
De : jseigh_es00 (at) *nospam* xemaps.com (jseigh)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++Date : 30. Oct 2024, 17:39:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vftnga$27k8k$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/29/24 18:05, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 10/28/2024 9:41 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
Ahhh, if you are using an async membar in your upcoming C++ version, then it would be fine. No problem. A compiler fence ala atomic_signal_fence, and the the explicit release, well, it will work. I don't see why it would not work.
For some reason, I thought you were going to not use an async membar in your C++ version. Sorry. However, it still would be fun to test against... ;^)
The C version has both versions. The C++ version does only the
async member version. But I'm not publishing that code so it's
a moot point.
smrproxy v2
Re: smrproxy v2