Sujet : Re: smrproxy v2
De : jseigh_es00 (at) *nospam* xemaps.com (jseigh)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++Date : 13. Dec 2024, 01:48:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjg08c$319q6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/12/24 16:55, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 12/12/2024 4:29 AM, jseigh wrote:
On 12/12/24 03:43, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/4/2024 4:46 AM, jseigh wrote:
>
>
Hummm... If I remember correctly, you said something about using a simple atomic exchange to pop a whole list (lock-free stack), then simple reversing the list to get a fifo order? Do you remember any of that way back on c.p.t?
>
That kind of stuff pre-dates c.p.t. even.
Has to. Although, it was not in the IBM principles of operation where the describe their lock-free stack in an appendix, iirc... I cannot remember the exact one right now. Iirc, it was under free pool manipulation?
If you pop off a LIFO stack onto another LIFO, everything becomes FIFO.
Also, there's a doubly linked stack where the back links are lazily
initialized. That seems to get reinvented every so often.
smrproxy v2
Re: smrproxy v2