Re: constexpr is really very smart!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: constexpr is really very smart!
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 16. Dec 2024, 10:28:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20241216112808.00003f74@yahoo.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 20:20:42 +0000
Student Project <student@invalid.invalid> wrote:

The constexpr is really very smart because it can speed up algorithms
1000 times according to Dave, Microsoft retired engineer. He has
proved it by creating this video:
 
<https://youtu.be/8-VZoXn8f9U?si=iy1UimoWcaLG31Xi>
 
On my computer it took 270 microseconds to calculate fib(35) like in
his example. It was almost instant at the blink of the eyes.
 
D:\CmdLine\C_Cpp\Chrono02>program 
Fibonacci_c: 9227465
Time Taken: 270 
D:\CmdLine\C_Cpp\Chrono02>program 
Fibonacci_c: 9227465
Time Taken: 257 
D:\CmdLine\C_Cpp\Chrono02>program 
Fibonacci_c: 9227465
Time Taken: 171 
D:\CmdLine\C_Cpp\Chrono02>program 
Fibonacci_c: 9227465
Time Taken: 176 
 
Amazing.
 

I didn't see the video (I never see that type of videos), but 270
microseconds sound astonishingly slow for fib(35).

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <intrin.h>

static long long fib(long n)
{
  if (fib <= 0)
    return 0;
  long long f0 = 0, f1 = 1;
  for (long i = 1; i < n; ++i) {
    long long f2 = f0 + f1;
    f0 = f1;
    f1 = f2;
  }
  return f1;
}

int main(int argz, char** argv)
{
  if (argz < 2) {
    printf("Go away!\n");
    return 1;
  }

  char* endp;
  long n = strtol(argv[1], &endp, 0);
  if (endp == argv[1]) {
    printf("%s is not a number. Go away!\n", argv[1]);
    return 1;
  }

  unsigned long long t0 = _rdtsc();
  long long f = fib(n);
  unsigned long long t1 = _rdtsc();
  printf("fib(%ld)=%lld. %lld clock cycles.\n", n, f, t1 - t0);
  return 0;
}

$ gcc -s -O2 -Wall fib.c -o fib
$ ./fib 35
fib(35)=9227465. 212 clock cycles.

212 cycles on this 11 y.o. CPU means 62 nanoseconds. Even that time, I
would guess, is mostly a measurement overhead.
$ ./fib 92
fib(92)=7540113804746346429. 281 clock cycles.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Dec 24 * constexpr is really very smart!39Student Project
16 Dec 24 +* Re: constexpr is really very smart!35Michael S
16 Dec 24 i+* Re: constexpr is really very smart!8David Brown
16 Dec 24 ii`* Re: constexpr is really very smart!7Michael S
16 Dec 24 ii +* Re: constexpr is really very smart!3David Brown
17 Dec 24 ii i`* Re: constexpr is really very smart!2Michael S
17 Dec 24 ii i `- Re: constexpr is really very smart!1David Brown
18 Dec 24 ii `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!3Tim Rentsch
18 Dec 24 ii  `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!2Michael S
18 Dec 24 ii   `- Re: constexpr is really very smart!1Tim Rentsch
17 Dec 24 i`* Re: constexpr is really very smart!26Tim Rentsch
18 Dec 24 i `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!25Michael S
18 Dec 24 i  +* Re: constexpr is really very smart!13Michael S
19 Dec 24 i  i+* Re: constexpr is really very smart!11Tim Rentsch
20 Dec 24 i  ii`* Re: constexpr is really very smart!10Michael S
20 Dec 24 i  ii `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!9Tim Rentsch
21 Dec 24 i  ii  `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!8Michael S
22 Dec 24 i  ii   `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!7Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24 i  ii    `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!6Michael S
24 Dec 24 i  ii     `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!5Tim Rentsch
25 Dec 24 i  ii      `* Bignum multiplication in Python vs GMP (was: constexpr is really very smart!)4Michael S
25 Dec 24 i  ii       +* Re: Bignum multiplication in Python vs GMP (was: constexpr is really very smart!)2Michael S
27 Dec 24 i  ii       i`- Re: Bignum multiplication in Python vs GMP (was: constexpr is really very smart!)1Tim Rentsch
27 Dec 24 i  ii       `- Re: Bignum multiplication in Python vs GMP (was: constexpr is really very smart!)1Tim Rentsch
19 Dec 24 i  i`- Re: constexpr is really very smart!1Student Project
18 Dec 24 i  `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!11Tim Rentsch
18 Dec 24 i   `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!10Michael S
19 Dec 24 i    `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!9Tim Rentsch
19 Dec 24 i     `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!8Michael S
20 Dec 24 i      `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!7Tim Rentsch
21 Dec 24 i       `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!6Michael S
21 Dec 24 i        +* Re: constexpr is really very smart!2James Kuyper
22 Dec 24 i        i`- Re: constexpr is really very smart!1Michael S
22 Dec 24 i        `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!3Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24 i         `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!2Michael S
23 Dec 24 i          `- Re: constexpr is really very smart!1Tim Rentsch
17 Dec 24 `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!3Keith Thompson
18 Dec 24  `* Re: constexpr is really very smart!2Student Project
18 Dec 24   `- Re: constexpr is really very smart!1Michael S

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal