Re: We have a new standard!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: We have a new standard!
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 29. Dec 2024, 18:08:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <e27f49e211b6d0a17d28e9b8205939652125ee91.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Evolution 3.54.2 (3.54.2-1.fc41)
On Sun, 2024-12-29 at 16:17 +0000, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 22:33:05 +0800
wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> gabbled:
with that. The wrong thing is regarding it as better new technology, especi> > ally
when libwy is more advanced (idea) than c++standard library by one generati> > on.
 
Nobody gives a rats arse about your library. Haven't you figured that out yet?
 

No problem for me. I just see you people suffering there, maybe enjoying.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Dec15:47 * We have a new standard!45Stefan Ram
28 Dec03:51 +* Re: We have a new standard!35Sam
28 Dec05:11 i+- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Dec11:19 i`* Re: We have a new standard!33Muttley
28 Dec16:20 i +* Re: We have a new standard!21David Brown
29 Dec10:32 i i`* Re: We have a new standard!20Muttley
29 Dec14:51 i i `* Re: We have a new standard!19David Brown
29 Dec17:16 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!6Muttley
30 Dec08:34 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!5David Brown
30 Dec10:34 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
30 Dec15:37 i i  i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3David Brown
30 Dec16:08 i i  i   `* Re: We have a new standard!2Muttley
31 Dec00:06 i i  i    `- Re: We have a new standard!1James Kuyper
29 Dec23:12 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!10Paavo Helde
29 Dec23:44 i i  i+* Re: We have a new standard!5Michael S
30 Dec12:17 i i  ii`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec13:00 i i  ii `* Re: We have a new standard!3boltar
30 Dec15:52 i i  ii  +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec03:06 i i  ii  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:14 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec16:05 i i  i +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec01:02 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!2Chris M. Thomasson
31 Dec02:58 i i  i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:25 i i  `* Re: We have a new standard!2Michael S
30 Dec17:15 i i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
28 Dec19:05 i `* Re: We have a new standard!11Phillip
29 Dec10:43 i  `* Re: We have a new standard!10Muttley
29 Dec14:50 i   `* Re: We have a new standard!9Sam
29 Dec15:33 i    +* Re: We have a new standard!4wij
29 Dec17:17 i    i`* Re: We have a new standard!3Muttley
29 Dec18:08 i    i `* Re: We have a new standard!2wij
29 Dec18:11 i    i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec17:15 i    `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
29 Dec17:57 i     `* Re: We have a new standard!3Sam
29 Dec18:08 i      +- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec18:50 i      `- Re: We have a new standard!1Michael S
28 Dec04:17 `* Re: We have a new standard!9Benutzer Eins
28 Dec17:19  `* Re: We have a new standard!8Chris Ahlstrom
28 Dec23:06   +* Re: We have a new standard!6Lynn McGuire
28 Dec23:07   i`* Re: We have a new standard!5Lynn McGuire
29 Dec01:41   i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:42   i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3Lynn McGuire
29 Dec03:46   i   +- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:47   i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec15:01   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal