Re: We have a new standard!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: We have a new standard!
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 29. Dec 2024, 23:44:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200
Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote:

On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote:
 
You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree
with the opinions of the committee members.
 
But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to
anyone. 
 
Thanks David, for standing against the trolls. It's a pity that
personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has
exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge".
 
I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might
hurt other people, or the nature for that matter. Boasting ignorant
jumble can easily do that.
 

It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why
stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn
in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Dec15:47 * We have a new standard!45Stefan Ram
28 Dec03:51 +* Re: We have a new standard!35Sam
28 Dec05:11 i+- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Dec11:19 i`* Re: We have a new standard!33Muttley
28 Dec16:20 i +* Re: We have a new standard!21David Brown
29 Dec10:32 i i`* Re: We have a new standard!20Muttley
29 Dec14:51 i i `* Re: We have a new standard!19David Brown
29 Dec17:16 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!6Muttley
30 Dec08:34 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!5David Brown
30 Dec10:34 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
30 Dec15:37 i i  i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3David Brown
30 Dec16:08 i i  i   `* Re: We have a new standard!2Muttley
31 Dec00:06 i i  i    `- Re: We have a new standard!1James Kuyper
29 Dec23:12 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!10Paavo Helde
29 Dec23:44 i i  i+* Re: We have a new standard!5Michael S
30 Dec12:17 i i  ii`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec13:00 i i  ii `* Re: We have a new standard!3boltar
30 Dec15:52 i i  ii  +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec03:06 i i  ii  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:14 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec16:05 i i  i +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec01:02 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!2Chris M. Thomasson
31 Dec02:58 i i  i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:25 i i  `* Re: We have a new standard!2Michael S
30 Dec17:15 i i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
28 Dec19:05 i `* Re: We have a new standard!11Phillip
29 Dec10:43 i  `* Re: We have a new standard!10Muttley
29 Dec14:50 i   `* Re: We have a new standard!9Sam
29 Dec15:33 i    +* Re: We have a new standard!4wij
29 Dec17:17 i    i`* Re: We have a new standard!3Muttley
29 Dec18:08 i    i `* Re: We have a new standard!2wij
29 Dec18:11 i    i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec17:15 i    `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
29 Dec17:57 i     `* Re: We have a new standard!3Sam
29 Dec18:08 i      +- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec18:50 i      `- Re: We have a new standard!1Michael S
28 Dec04:17 `* Re: We have a new standard!9Benutzer Eins
28 Dec17:19  `* Re: We have a new standard!8Chris Ahlstrom
28 Dec23:06   +* Re: We have a new standard!6Lynn McGuire
28 Dec23:07   i`* Re: We have a new standard!5Lynn McGuire
29 Dec01:41   i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:42   i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3Lynn McGuire
29 Dec03:46   i   +- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:47   i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec15:01   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal