Re: We have a new standard!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: We have a new standard!
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 30. Dec 2024, 16:05:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vkucru$1lt2f$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 30/12/2024 12:14, Tim Rentsch wrote:

Personal opinion:  the comments from David Brown do more harm than
good here.  At some level he is just a guilty of giving a preachy
opinion as the person he is responding to.  It seems likely that
his statements will exacerbate the offending behavior rather than
diminish it.
Opinion noted.
I disagree that I was giving a "preachy /opinion/", but I can accept that my posts were somewhat "preachy" in style.  What influence it may have on Muttley (or anyone else giving unjustified opinions on a standard they have not looked at) remains to be seen - I don't think anyone is in a position to predict accurately.
(I don't always agree with such feedback, but I do always try to give it fair consideration.)
Perhaps we can have a more topical discussion about the actual changes and new features in C++23?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Dec15:47 * We have a new standard!45Stefan Ram
28 Dec03:51 +* Re: We have a new standard!35Sam
28 Dec05:11 i+- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Dec11:19 i`* Re: We have a new standard!33Muttley
28 Dec16:20 i +* Re: We have a new standard!21David Brown
29 Dec10:32 i i`* Re: We have a new standard!20Muttley
29 Dec14:51 i i `* Re: We have a new standard!19David Brown
29 Dec17:16 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!6Muttley
30 Dec08:34 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!5David Brown
30 Dec10:34 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
30 Dec15:37 i i  i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3David Brown
30 Dec16:08 i i  i   `* Re: We have a new standard!2Muttley
31 Dec00:06 i i  i    `- Re: We have a new standard!1James Kuyper
29 Dec23:12 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!10Paavo Helde
29 Dec23:44 i i  i+* Re: We have a new standard!5Michael S
30 Dec12:17 i i  ii`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec13:00 i i  ii `* Re: We have a new standard!3boltar
30 Dec15:52 i i  ii  +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec03:06 i i  ii  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:14 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec16:05 i i  i +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec01:02 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!2Chris M. Thomasson
31 Dec02:58 i i  i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:25 i i  `* Re: We have a new standard!2Michael S
30 Dec17:15 i i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
28 Dec19:05 i `* Re: We have a new standard!11Phillip
29 Dec10:43 i  `* Re: We have a new standard!10Muttley
29 Dec14:50 i   `* Re: We have a new standard!9Sam
29 Dec15:33 i    +* Re: We have a new standard!4wij
29 Dec17:17 i    i`* Re: We have a new standard!3Muttley
29 Dec18:08 i    i `* Re: We have a new standard!2wij
29 Dec18:11 i    i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec17:15 i    `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
29 Dec17:57 i     `* Re: We have a new standard!3Sam
29 Dec18:08 i      +- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec18:50 i      `- Re: We have a new standard!1Michael S
28 Dec04:17 `* Re: We have a new standard!9Benutzer Eins
28 Dec17:19  `* Re: We have a new standard!8Chris Ahlstrom
28 Dec23:06   +* Re: We have a new standard!6Lynn McGuire
28 Dec23:07   i`* Re: We have a new standard!5Lynn McGuire
29 Dec01:41   i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:42   i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3Lynn McGuire
29 Dec03:46   i   +- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:47   i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec15:01   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal