Re: We have a new standard!

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:37:45 +0100
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wibbled:

On 30/12/2024 10:34, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:34:32 +0100
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> gabbled:

On 29/12/2024 17:16, Muttley@dastardlyhq.com wrote:

On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 14:51:17 +0100
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> gabbled:

But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to anyone.

>
Ah ok , its the usual "anyone who disagrees with me POV is ignorant"
position
is it?
>

>
It's not a matter of agreement or disagreement.  You know - by your
own admission - /nothing/ about C++23.  Your ignorance is not a matter
of opinion but a matter of fact.

 
I'm going by 2017 and 2020 adding little of value to the language. I very
much doubt they've suddenly found some paradigm changing additions.
 

I'm not disagreeing about your /opinions/ of C++23 - I am simply
stating that any opinions you have, until you have learned at least a
little about the new standard, are totally worthless.

 
So you think I've never browsed anything to do with 23? Thats a hell of an
assumption.
 

>
You wrote: "Being serious, I haven't even checked whats new in it..."
followed by assumptions about C++23.  The only assumption /I/ made was
that you were telling the truth - was that unreasonable?

I'd skimmed the wiki entry, nothing in depth. It was enough. But hey, they've
renamed puts() to println() so win! Not.