Re: We have a new standard!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: We have a new standard!
De : jameskuyper (at) *nospam* alumni.caltech.edu (James Kuyper)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 31. Dec 2024, 00:06:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vkv91e$1r558$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/30/24 10:08, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:37:45 +0100
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wibbled:
...
You wrote: "Being serious, I haven't even checked whats new in it..."
followed by assumptions about C++23.  The only assumption /I/ made was
that you were telling the truth - was that unreasonable?
 
I'd skimmed the wiki entry, nothing in depth. It was enough. But hey, they've
renamed puts() to println() so win! Not.

So, David's assumption was unreasonable?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Dec15:47 * We have a new standard!45Stefan Ram
28 Dec03:51 +* Re: We have a new standard!35Sam
28 Dec05:11 i+- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
28 Dec11:19 i`* Re: We have a new standard!33Muttley
28 Dec16:20 i +* Re: We have a new standard!21David Brown
29 Dec10:32 i i`* Re: We have a new standard!20Muttley
29 Dec14:51 i i `* Re: We have a new standard!19David Brown
29 Dec17:16 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!6Muttley
30 Dec08:34 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!5David Brown
30 Dec10:34 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
30 Dec15:37 i i  i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3David Brown
30 Dec16:08 i i  i   `* Re: We have a new standard!2Muttley
31 Dec00:06 i i  i    `- Re: We have a new standard!1James Kuyper
29 Dec23:12 i i  +* Re: We have a new standard!10Paavo Helde
29 Dec23:44 i i  i+* Re: We have a new standard!5Michael S
30 Dec12:17 i i  ii`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec13:00 i i  ii `* Re: We have a new standard!3boltar
30 Dec15:52 i i  ii  +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec03:06 i i  ii  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:14 i i  i`* Re: We have a new standard!4Tim Rentsch
30 Dec16:05 i i  i +- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
31 Dec01:02 i i  i `* Re: We have a new standard!2Chris M. Thomasson
31 Dec02:58 i i  i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Tim Rentsch
30 Dec12:25 i i  `* Re: We have a new standard!2Michael S
30 Dec17:15 i i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown
28 Dec19:05 i `* Re: We have a new standard!11Phillip
29 Dec10:43 i  `* Re: We have a new standard!10Muttley
29 Dec14:50 i   `* Re: We have a new standard!9Sam
29 Dec15:33 i    +* Re: We have a new standard!4wij
29 Dec17:17 i    i`* Re: We have a new standard!3Muttley
29 Dec18:08 i    i `* Re: We have a new standard!2wij
29 Dec18:11 i    i  `- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec17:15 i    `* Re: We have a new standard!4Muttley
29 Dec17:57 i     `* Re: We have a new standard!3Sam
29 Dec18:08 i      +- Re: We have a new standard!1Muttley
29 Dec18:50 i      `- Re: We have a new standard!1Michael S
28 Dec04:17 `* Re: We have a new standard!9Benutzer Eins
28 Dec17:19  `* Re: We have a new standard!8Chris Ahlstrom
28 Dec23:06   +* Re: We have a new standard!6Lynn McGuire
28 Dec23:07   i`* Re: We have a new standard!5Lynn McGuire
29 Dec01:41   i `* Re: We have a new standard!4Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:42   i  `* Re: We have a new standard!3Lynn McGuire
29 Dec03:46   i   +- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec03:47   i   `- Re: We have a new standard!1Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec15:01   `- Re: We have a new standard!1David Brown

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal