Re: We have a new standard!

boltar@caprica.org writes:

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wibbled:
>

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200
Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote:
>

On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote:
>

You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree
with the opinions of the committee members.
>
But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to
anyone.

>
Thanks David, for standing against the trolls.  It's a pity that
personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has
exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge".
>
I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might
hurt other people, or the nature for that matter.  Boasting ignorant
jumble can easily do that.

>
It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why
stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn
in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal.

>
For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments.
I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful
of interactions.

>
The same could be said about you.

I assume you mean that someone might have the same reaction to me
as you imagine I have to Muttley.  Note that I didn't say anything
about Muttley;  my comments were statements only about myself, not
about anyone else.