Re: We have a new standard!

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:
[...]

Stroustrup in section 23.2 of his 4th edition C++ book notes that
these two are equivalent:
>
    template<typename X>
    template<class X>
>
but that for typename X, X need not be a class.

X need not be a class in either case.

"""
You may prefer the shorter and equivalent form template<class C>. In
either case, C is a type name; it need not be the name of a class.
"""

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */