Sujet : ({
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++Date : 20. Mar 2025, 19:27:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vrhmme$8v0$1@news.muc.de>
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
Hello, C++.
I'm having some difficulty (amending Emacs's C++ Mode) reconciling the
two conflicting uses in C++ of ({.
Firstly, it is used as a "statement expression", a GCC enhancement also
found in C, allowing a more relaxed and natural way to write an
expression as the end result of a sequence of statements:
({ int y = foo (); int z;
if (y > 0) z = y;
else z = - y;
z; })
. I think this usage is very old.
Secondly, there's initialisation expressions like:
void f4 (int a, int b, int c)
{
std::vector<ABC> abcList2(
{{a+6,
b+6,
c+6}
}
);
....
}
. Here the ( on the std::vector line, together with the next {, can be
confused as a statement expression, though it's clearly not meant that
way. I think this syntax is much newer than the other one, though I may
be wrong here.
In calculating the indentation for source lines in these constructs, the
ambiguity causes mis-indentation for one or the other of them.
Now to my question: how common is GCC's statement expression in the wide
world of C++ source code? How much would be lost if I simply removed the
statement expression from C++ Mode's parsing functions?
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).