Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++ comp.lang.c
Date : 21. May 2025, 12:48:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <100kehj$2pl8c$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 21/05/2025 12:40, Sam wrote:
Stackoverflow's content moderation policies pissed off their most productive contributors, so they all left
Good.
I'm sick and tired of searching for a documentation Web site and having to wade through dozens of hits from non-normative Web forums that don't quite have the answer for the question I didn't quite ask.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 May 25 * “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”8Lynn McGuire
21 May 25 `* Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”7Sam
21 May 25  +- Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”1Richard Heathfield
21 May 25  +- Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”1Kaz Kylheku
24 May 25  +- Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”1Ross Finlayson
25 May 25  +* Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 May 25  i`- Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”1Sam
27 May 25  `- Re: “The Pulse #134: Stack overflow is almost dead”1Ar Rakin

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal