Concerning your subject; it wouldn't appear to me to use the termMy perception of beauty is just as subjective as your perception of the
"beauty" in context of C++. C++ inherited so much ugly syntax and
concepts (from "C") and it added yet more syntactic infelicities.
(And I'm saying that as someone who liked to program in C++, also
professionally, for many many years.)
ugly aspects of C++. I like the span of lowleven means in C++ that are
inherited from C to higher level abstractions C++ has inherited from
other more moderrn language.
And if you don't the subjektive part of beauty or ugly parts of this
language C++ is several times more effective than C, i.e. you need
only a fraction of the code size while mostly maintaining the same
performance.
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 12 Mar 26 |  Re: Isn't that beauty ? | 2 | Bonita Montero | |
| 12 Mar 26 |   Re: Isn't that beauty ? | 1 | Janis Papanagnou |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.