Re: A neat hash table implementation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: A neat hash table implementation
De : Bonita.Montero (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Bonita Montero)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 10. Apr 2026, 17:50:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <10rb9nh$17koh$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 10.04.2026 um 18:16 schrieb wij:

I just mention a point: What does it mean "incrementing pointers" in C++ ???
Going through an unordered_map with iterator is similar to incrementing
a pointer.

It seems you are talking about ideal.
C++ is closer to that than C.

If so simple,easy,powerful, why many programmers (esp. beginners) avoid C++,
 > ...
There are a lot of developers with a minimalism mindeset. Being focussed
on details is an attitude you must have as a developer, but if you're
only on this level like a lot of passioned C developers, you make a big
mistake since you don't see the opportunties the abstaction levels above
in C++ provide.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Apr 26 * Re: A neat hash table implementation19Michael S
10 Apr 26 `* Re: A neat hash table implementation18Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  +* Re: A neat hash table implementation16wij
10 Apr 26  i`* Re: A neat hash table implementation15Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i +* Re: A neat hash table implementation12wij
10 Apr 26  i i`* Re: A neat hash table implementation11Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i `* Re: A neat hash table implementation10wij
10 Apr 26  i i  +* Re: A neat hash table implementation7Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i  i`* Re: A neat hash table implementation6wij
10 Apr 26  i i  i `* Re: A neat hash table implementation5Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i  i  `* Re: A neat hash table implementation4wij
11 Apr07:26  i i  i   `* Re: A neat hash table implementation3Bonita Montero
11 Apr13:09  i i  i    `* Re: A neat hash table implementation2wij
11 Apr13:29  i i  i     `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i  `* Re: A neat hash table implementation2Michael S
10 Apr 26  i i   `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1wij
10 Apr 26  i `* Re: A neat hash table implementation2🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱
10 Apr 26  i  `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1wij

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal