Re: A neat hash table implementation

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c++ 
Sujet : Re: A neat hash table implementation
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.lang.c++
Date : 10. Apr 2026, 18:40:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <695dcfcbd794aa5799ec94d157620e70f90896ce.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43)
On Fri, 2026-04-10 at 18:50 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 10.04.2026 um 18:16 schrieb wij:
 
I just mention a point: What does it mean "incrementing pointers" in C++ ???
 
Going through an unordered_map with iterator is similar to incrementing
a pointer.
 
It seems you are talking about ideal.
 
C++ is closer to that than C.
 
If so simple,easy,powerful, why many programmers (esp. beginners) avoid C++,
 > ...
 
There are a lot of developers with a minimalism mindeset. Being focussed
on details is an attitude you must have as a developer, but if you're
only on this level like a lot of passioned C developers, you make a big
mistake since you don't see the opportunties the abstaction levels above
in C++ provide.

C++ provides 'illusions' (simple/fast/elegant..), you need to know the low level,
hardware events to harness it, or there are 'surprises'.

All programming have to be converted to machine codes. Human abstraction or
ideal has no position in CPU's eye (so far, no computing model can surpass
Turing Machine). Some languages can simply its programming model, but not C++.

Doing so (making C++ high level language) might be possible, but not in the
programs you have shown. Your code is immature.



Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Apr 26 * Re: A neat hash table implementation19Michael S
10 Apr 26 `* Re: A neat hash table implementation18Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  +* Re: A neat hash table implementation16wij
10 Apr 26  i`* Re: A neat hash table implementation15Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i +* Re: A neat hash table implementation12wij
10 Apr 26  i i`* Re: A neat hash table implementation11Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i `* Re: A neat hash table implementation10wij
10 Apr 26  i i  +* Re: A neat hash table implementation7Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i  i`* Re: A neat hash table implementation6wij
10 Apr 26  i i  i `* Re: A neat hash table implementation5Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i  i  `* Re: A neat hash table implementation4wij
11 Apr07:26  i i  i   `* Re: A neat hash table implementation3Bonita Montero
11 Apr13:09  i i  i    `* Re: A neat hash table implementation2wij
11 Apr13:29  i i  i     `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  i i  `* Re: A neat hash table implementation2Michael S
10 Apr 26  i i   `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1wij
10 Apr 26  i `* Re: A neat hash table implementation2🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱
10 Apr 26  i  `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1Bonita Montero
10 Apr 26  `- Re: A neat hash table implementation1wij

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal