Re: encapsulating directory operations

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: encapsulating directory operations
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 20. May 2025, 13:23:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100hs85$27qbn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 20/05/2025 11:36, Paul Edwards wrote:
"Keith Thompson" <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:87ecwj1vy9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com...
"Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com> writes:
>

And C90 (etc) could potentially be extended to include a folder.h
>
C90 will never be extended.  It was made obsolete by C99, which was made
obsolete by C11, which was made obsolete by C23.  You're free to invent
your own language based on C90 if you like, but C went in a different
direction decades ago.
 That depends on your definition of "C". Ritchie is no longer here to
adjudicate whether something close to C90 - in the spirit of the
original C, is the true successor to his language, and which one is
a complete and utter joke of no relation to anything he designed.
 
Once C was standardised - first by ANSI, then immediately afterwards by ISO - the "definition of C" became clear.  The language is covered by an international standard, so "C" is the language defined by that standard.   Thus "C" means "C23" at the moment - each newly published C standard "cancels and replaces" the previous version.  Ritchie's opinion hasn't had any connection to the "definition of C" since 1989.  I don't know if he ever expressed a public opinion on C99, or the plans for C11.  I would, however, be astounded if he had considered it "a complete and utter joke of no relation to anything he designed".
(And while I don't think that an "appeal to authority" argument has much merit, he did say that he found Linux "quite delightful" as a continuation of UNIX, and I would not expect him to have viewed your OS ideas as productive.)

A semantic debate that doesn't answer my question either way anyway.
 
You did ask us not to give the obvious answer to your original post.
But Keith is absolutely correct here.  C90 is C90, and will remain that way (baring the very unlikely possibility of minor technical corrections).
You can make your own libraries, and OS's, and extensions, and languages - whatever makes you happy.  (And if you enjoy what you are doing, and it's not harming anyone, then that's all the reason you need.  You don't need approval from anyone else.  Don't let me or anyone else hinder you enjoying yourself.)  However, nothing that you ever do will be an extension to C90.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May 25 * encapsulating directory operations308Paul Edwards
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations83Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May 25 i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations20Paul Edwards
21 May 25 ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations18Paul Edwards
21 May 25 ii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May 25 ii   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
22 May 25 ii   i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 25 ii   i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
22 May 25 ii   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations13James Kuyper
22 May 25 ii    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 25 ii     `* Re: encapsulating directory operations11James Kuyper
22 May 25 ii      `* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 25 ii       `* Re: encapsulating directory operations9James Kuyper
23 May 25 ii        `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Kaz Kylheku
23 May 25 ii         +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
23 May 25 ii         i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
24 May 25 ii         i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 25 ii         `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
23 May 25 ii          `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Kaz Kylheku
24 May 25 ii           `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
24 May 25 ii            `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
31 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations62Bonita Montero
31 May 25 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations61Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Jun 25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations60Bonita Montero
1 Jun 25 i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations59Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jun 25 i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations58Bonita Montero
3 Jun 25 i     +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
3 Jun 25 i     i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
3 Jun 25 i     +* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
10 Jun 25 i     i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Bonita Montero
10 Jun 25 i     i +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
10 Jun 25 i     i +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
11 Jun 25 i     i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Jun 25 i     i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Bonita Montero
11 Jun 25 i     i   +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
11 Jun 25 i     i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Bonita Montero
12 Jun 25 i     i    `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun 25 i     `* Re: encapsulating directory operations46Bonita Montero
6 Jun 25 i      `* Re: encapsulating directory operations45Bonita Montero
6 Jun 25 i       `* Re: encapsulating directory operations44Bonita Montero
6 Jun 25 i        `* Re: encapsulating directory operations43Bonita Montero
6 Jun 25 i         `* Re: encapsulating directory operations42wij
7 Jun 25 i          `* Re: encapsulating directory operations41Bonita Montero
7 Jun 25 i           `* Re: encapsulating directory operations40wij
7 Jun 25 i            `* Re: encapsulating directory operations39Bonita Montero
7 Jun 25 i             `* Re: encapsulating directory operations38wij
7 Jun 25 i              `* Re: encapsulating directory operations37Bonita Montero
7 Jun 25 i               +* Re: encapsulating directory operations22wij
7 Jun 25 i               i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations20Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations12Muttley
8 Jun 25 i               i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations11Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Muttley
8 Jun 25 i               i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Bonita Montero
9 Jun 25 i               i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Muttley
9 Jun 25 i               i i  i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
10 Jun 25 i               i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch
8 Jun 25 i               i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
9 Jun 25 i               i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1wij
9 Jun 25 i               i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Muttley
9 Jun 25 i               i i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations5wij
8 Jun 25 i               i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3wij
8 Jun 25 i               i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i               i i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1wij
9 Jun 25 i               i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Jun 25 i               i  `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
7 Jun 25 i               `* Re: encapsulating directory operations14Janis Papanagnou
8 Jun 25 i                `* Re: encapsulating directory operations13Bonita Montero
8 Jun 25 i                 +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Chris M. Thomasson
8 Jun 25 i                 `* Re: encapsulating directory operations11Bonita Montero
9 Jun 25 i                  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Bonita Montero
9 Jun 25 i                  i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Bonita Montero
9 Jun 25 i                  ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
10 Jun 25 i                  ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Muttley
10 Jun 25 i                  iii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Muttley
10 Jun 25 i                  iii`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Chris M. Thomasson
10 Jun 25 i                  ii`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Waldek Hebisch
9 Jun 25 i                  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
10 Jun 25 i                  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Tim Rentsch
10 Jun 25 i                   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations74Keith Thompson
20 May 25 i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations28Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May 25 ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Kaz Kylheku
20 May 25 iii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 iii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Muttley
20 May 25 iii i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May 25 iii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
20 May 25 iii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May 25 iii   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
23 May 25 ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations18Tim Rentsch
23 May 25 ii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
24 May 25 ii i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Tim Rentsch
24 May 25 ii i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Richard Heathfield
28 May 25 ii i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Tim Rentsch
28 May 25 ii i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
26 May 25 ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations11Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood
20 May 25 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations45Paul Edwards
20 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations145Kaz Kylheku
21 May 25 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Janis Papanagnou
22 May 25 +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
25 May 25 `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal