Re: encapsulating directory operations

"Lawrence D'Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in message
news:100j5q0$2fqhj$4@dont-email.me...

On Tue, 20 May 2025 19:36:06 +1000, Paul Edwards wrote:
>

Ritchie is no longer here to adjudicate whether something close to
C90 - in the spirit of the original C, is the true successor to his
language, and which one is a complete and utter joke of no relation
to anything he designed.

>
Remember also that his vision of C was something very much designed to
work on a Unix-type OS. Or at least with a POSIX API layer underneath.
Without that, C is a pretty sad language indeed.

I don't consider C without POSIX to be sad.

I consider it to be beautiful.

My programs work anywhere.

We have very different goals.

That doesn't prohibit answering the technical questions,
should you choose to do so.

BFN. Paul.