Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 22. Apr 2025, 22:40:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250422142113.403@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2025-04-22, bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
On 22/04/2025 20:26, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-04-22, bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>
Or would you automatically say it was reasonable no matter how many
levels there were, just to disagee with me and to side with a fellow C
programmer?
 
You're trying to say that C is a bad language because you can have
7 or more layers of macro expansion, but you're not considering how
bizarre and crippling restriction it would be to put a cap on it.
>
Here, I'm trying to determine if this is the poster's honest, objective
opinion, or whether they'd always going to be defend such code no matter
what.

I identified some macros in there that look gratuitous; you just snipped
that part.

but you're not considering how
bizarre and crippling restriction it would be to put a cap on it.
>
There WILL be a cap. Some deep nesting might be justified in special
cases, for example some recursive macro that builds a string a character
at a time.
>
But this was not such a case; it was simply decided to make it work
using macros instead of functions.

If you're going to criticize the macros, then hold the code constant.

If it is a given requirement that some code is to be written or
generated, and we have some macros which do that, are those macros a
"good" or "bad" solution?

If you think some other code shoud be written or generated, and not
the code produced by those macros, or equivalent to it, then that
doesn't speak to those macros.

It looks like that Lua VM is doing way too much work just to dispatch
an opcode, but if we take that crud as a given, the layers of macros may
be a bad way to obtain it, out of all the alternatives. A somewhat
cleaned up version of those macros would likely be better.

I don't think Lua is very good; I would never choose it for anything, or
basically go anywhere near it. I'm not even slightly surprised the code
is grotty.

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Apr 25 * do { quit; } else { }625Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
4 Apr 25 i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
8 Apr 25 ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1candycanearter07
5 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 25 i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Janis Papanagnou
6 Apr 25 i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Michael S
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }608Tim Rentsch
4 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }607Thiago Adams
6 Apr 25 i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }600Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }550Michael S
6 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }549Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }548Michael S
7 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }547Tim Rentsch
7 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }546Michael S
7 Apr 25 i ii    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }542bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }541David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }540bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }535David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }534bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }78Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }77bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }74Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }73bart
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }72Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }71bart
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }68Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }63bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }61Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Michael S
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }58bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii +* Re: do { quit; } else { }43Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }39bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]16bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iii+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]14Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]13bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]10David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii  `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]9bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]5Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]4bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]3Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i  +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i  `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +- Re: Endless complaints1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iii`- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }22Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }21bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }20Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }19Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }16Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
13 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }13Michael S
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }12Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }11David Brown
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }10Keith Thompson
13 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }9David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i     `* Re: do { quit; } else { }8James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      +* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Keith Thompson
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
15 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }14Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }5Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
5 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii   `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Bonita Montero
9 May 25 i ii    i  i i i     `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Richard Damon
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }455David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Ike Naar
8 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }49Michael S
7 May 25 i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Wuns Haerst
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
18 Apr 25 `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal