Re: really big physics

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: really big physics
De : user (at) *nospam* example.net (bitrex)
Groupes : sci.electronics.design
Date : 01. Apr 2025, 20:35:16
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <67ec3fab$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/1/2025 2:02 PM, john larkin wrote:
 https://www.breitbart.com/news/scientists-release-plans-for-an-even-bigger-atom-smasher-along-the-french-swiss-border/
 
Watching the technocrat STEM supremacy-type conservatives fight it out with the back-to-nature, government should never do anything except enforce the 10 Commandments, science is the tool of Satan-style conservatives in the comments is always a treat.
At least one correctly notes that it was a Democrat-majority Congress that cancelled the Superconducting Super Collider in '93. I wonder how many of the Clinton administration's playbooks are left lying around in DC, the Clintons should probably sue DOGE for plagiarizing their ideas.
But the Reagan administration sure was a different time it's like the right simply hasn't really known what to do with itself for 30 years, until Trump showed up to give this cat-herding exercise a heavy dose of identity politics to bond over.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 May 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal