Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator

Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> writes:

JeanHeyd Meneide, a Project Editor for WG14, has just posted the results
of a survey re. the preferred form of a new array size operator:
>
-- https://thephd.dev/the-big-array-size-survey-for-c-results

Curious.  The top objection to the usual macro solution is given as:

  * double-evaluation of e.g. getting the size of the 1-d part of a 2-d
    array int meow[3][4]; /* ... */ SIZE_KEYWORD(meow[first_idx()]);

Does the author not know that there is no evaluation of the operands of
sizeof in this example?

His "About" pages says "Project Editor for ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG14 -
Programming Languages, C".

--
Ben.