size_t best practice

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : size_t best practice
De : mark (at) *nospam* qtrac.eu (Mark Summerfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 18. Aug 2024, 10:03:08
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <VdCcne2MOeshN1z7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Many C std. lib. functions accept and/or return size_t values esp. for
arrays incl. char* strings.

In view of this I'm using size_t throughout my code for array sizes and
indexes.

However, this means I have to be very careful never to decrement a size_t of
value 0, since, e.g., size_t size = 0; size--; results in size ==
18446744073709551615.

So I need to guard against this. Here is an example I'm using
(without the assert()s):

void vec_insert(vec* v, size_t index, void* value) {
    if (v->_size == v->_cap) {
        vec_grow(v);
    }
    for (size_t i = v->_size - 1; i >= index; --i) {
        v->_values[i + 1] = v->_values[i];
        if (!i) // if i == 0, --i will wrap!
            break;
    }
    v->_values[index] = value;
    v->_size++;
}

I've also noticed that quite a few array-related algorithms _assume_ that
indexes are signed, so again I have to put in guards to avoid subtracting
below zero when I use size_t when implementing them.

So is it considered best practice to use int, long, long long, or size_t,
in situations like these?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Aug 24 * size_t best practice23Mark Summerfield
18 Aug 24 +* Re: size_t best practice3Ike Naar
18 Aug 24 i`* Re: size_t best practice2Mark Summerfield
20 Aug 24 i `- Re: size_t best practice1Andrey Tarasevich
18 Aug 24 +- Re: size_t best practice1Michael S
18 Aug 24 +- Re: size_t best practice1Tim Rentsch
18 Aug 24 +* Re: size_t best practice6Stefan Ram
18 Aug 24 i+* Re: size_t best practice4Michael S
19 Aug 24 ii`* Re: size_t best practice3Tim Rentsch
19 Aug 24 ii `* Re: size_t best practice2Michael S
19 Aug 24 ii  `- Re: size_t best practice1Tim Rentsch
18 Aug 24 i`- Re: size_t best practice1Tim Rentsch
20 Aug 24 +* Re: size_t best practice7Andrey Tarasevich
20 Aug 24 i+* Re: size_t best practice3Andrey Tarasevich
20 Aug 24 ii`* Re: size_t best practice2Andrey Tarasevich
22 Aug 24 ii `- Re: size_t best practice1Tim Rentsch
22 Aug 24 i`* Re: size_t best practice3Tim Rentsch
22 Aug 24 i `* Re: size_t best practice2Ike Naar
22 Aug 24 i  `- Re: size_t best practice1Tim Rentsch
24 Aug 24 +* Re: size_t best practice3Bonita Montero
25 Aug 24 i`* Re: size_t best practice2Bonita Montero
26 Aug 24 i `- Re: size_t best practice1Vir Campestris
27 Aug 24 `- Re: size_t best practice1Bonita Montero

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal