Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 22. Apr 2025, 13:57:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <c2ad5086dba36124c070173c3e3252967df2fab9@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:44:06 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 4/15/2025 2:03 PM, dbush wrote:
On 4/15/2025 2:50 PM, olcott wrote:
On 4/15/2025 11:05 AM, dbush wrote:
On 4/15/2025 11:29 AM, olcott wrote:

*corresponding output to the input*
Not freaking allowed to look at any damn thing else besides the
freaking input. Must compute whatever mapping ACTUALLY EXISTS FROM
THIS INPUT.
>
So the algorithm HHH that you've implemented computes *some*
computable function, but it does not compute the halting function as
it is not computable.
>
*corresponding output to the input*
>
That doesn't refute anything I said.
 
You continue to stupidly insist that int sum(int x, int y) {return x +
y; }
returns 7 for sum(3,2) because you incorrectly understand how these
things fundamentally work.
 
It is stupidly wrong to expect HHH(DD) report on the direct execution of
DD when you are not telling it one damn thing about this direct
execution.
What else is it missing that the processor uses to execute it?

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal