Sujet : Re: A Famous Security Bug
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 25. Mar 2024, 13:26:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utrqgp$12v02$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 25/03/2024 12:16, Michael S wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:43:32 +0100
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>
I could be wrong here, of course.
>
It seems, you are.
It happens - and it was not unexpected here, as I said. I don't have all these compilers installed to test.
But it would be helpful if you had a /little/ more information. If you don't know why some compilers generate binaries that have memory mapped at 0x400000, and others do not, fair enough. I am curious, but it's not at all important.
Re: A Famous Security Bug
Re: A Famous Security Bug