Sujet : Re: question about linker
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 30. Nov 2024, 04:25:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vie0j5$1g968$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 30.11.2024 02:28, Keith Thompson wrote:
Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]
I can tell that in my syntax, function definitions start with a line
like this ([...] means optional; | separates choices):
>
['global'|'export'] 'func'|'proc' name ...
>
Which one do you think would be easier? (Function declarations are
generally not used.)
I don't care.
Yes, languages than C can have better declaration syntax than C does
(where "better" is clearly subjective). Perhaps yours does. [...]
From the various bits and pieces spread around I saw that Bart had
obviously adopted many syntactical elements of Algol 68, and I wonder
why he hadn't used just this language (or any "better" language than
"C") if he dislikes it so much that he even implemented own languages.
But okay.
Janis