Re: transpiling to low level C

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: transpiling to low level C
De : cr88192 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (BGB)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 16. Dec 2024, 00:53:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjnq5s$pubt$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/15/2024 3:32 PM, bart wrote:
On 15/12/2024 19:08, Bonita Montero wrote:
C++ is more readable because is is magnitudes more expressive than C.
You can easily write a C++-statement that would hunddres of lines in
C (imagines specializing a unordered_map by hand). Making a language
less expressive makes it even less readable, and that's also true for
your reduced C.
>
 That's not really the point of it. This reduced C is used as an intermediate language for a compiler target. It will not usually be read, or maintained.
 An intermediate language needs to at a lower level than the source language.
 And for this project, it needs to be compilable by any C89 compiler.
 Generating C++ would be quite useless.
 
As an IL, even C is a little overkill, unless turned into a restricted subset (say, along similar lines to GCC's GIMPLE).
Say:
   Only function-scope variables allowed;
   No high-level control structures;
   ...
Say:
   int foo(int x)
   {
     int i, v;
     for(i=x, v=0; i>0; i--)
       v=v*i;
     return(v);
   }
Becoming, say:
   int foo(int x)
   {
     int i;
     int v;
     i=x;
     v=0;
     if(i<=0)goto L1;
     L0:
     v=v*i;
     i=i-1;
     if(i>0)goto L0;
     L1:
     return v;
   }
...
Though, this still requires the backend to have a full parser.
Would still be simpler still for a backend to use a plain binary serialization, and/or maybe a syntax more like BASIC or similar.
Say:
   SUB foo ( x as Int ) as Int
     DIM i as Int
     DIM v as Int
     i=x
     v=0
     IF i <= 0 THEN GOTO L1
     L0:
     v = v * i
     i = i - 1
     IF i > 0 THEN GOTO L0
     L1:
     RETURN v
   END SUB
Where one can have a parser that reads one line at a time, breaks it into tokens, and does simple pattern matching.
Pretty much all higher level control flow can be expressed via goto.
Variables within sub-blocks can be promoted to function scope, possibly renamed:
   int i;
   if() {
     long i;
     ...
   }
Remaps:
   int i$0;
   long i$1;
"switch()" can be decomposed:
   switch(i)
   {
     case 1:
       A;
       break;
     case 2:
       B;
     case 3:
       C;
   }
To:
   if(i==1)goto CL1;
   if(i==2)goto CL2;
   if(i==3)goto CL3;
   goto CDFL;
   CL1:
     A;
     goto CEND;
   CL2:
     B;
   CL3:
     C;
   CDFL:
   CEND:
...

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Dec 24 * transpiling to low level C138Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C9Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 i `* Re: transpiling to low level C8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C7Thiago Adams
16 Dec 24 i   `* Re: transpiling to low level C6BGB
16 Dec 24 i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Thiago Adams
16 Dec 24 i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
16 Dec 24 i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 i    `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Keith Thompson
17 Dec 24 i     `- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C5Chris M. Thomasson
15 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C4Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 i `* Re: transpiling to low level C3Chris M. Thomasson
16 Feb06:01 i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Chris M. Thomasson
16 Feb14:17 i   `- USENET and spam (Was: Re: transpiling to low level C)1Salvador Mirzo
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C3bart
15 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Thiago Adams
15 Dec 24 +* Re: transpiling to low level C117Bonita Montero
15 Dec 24 i+* Re: transpiling to low level C114bart
16 Dec 24 ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C113BGB
16 Dec 24 ii +- Re: transpiling to low level C1David Brown
16 Dec 24 ii +* Re: transpiling to low level C22Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24 ii i`* Re: transpiling to low level C21BGB
17 Dec 24 ii i `* Re: transpiling to low level C20Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24 ii i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C15Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24 ii i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C14Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24 ii i  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C13bart
17 Dec 24 ii i  i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C12Thiago Adams
17 Dec 24 ii i  i   `* Re: transpiling to low level C11bart
18 Dec 24 ii i  i    `* Re: transpiling to low level C10BGB
18 Dec 24 ii i  i     `* Re: transpiling to low level C9Thiago Adams
19 Dec 24 ii i  i      `* Re: transpiling to low level C8BGB
19 Dec 24 ii i  i       `* Re: transpiling to low level C7bart
19 Dec 24 ii i  i        `* Re: transpiling to low level C6BGB
19 Dec 24 ii i  i         +* Re: transpiling to low level C3bart
19 Dec 24 ii i  i         i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2BGB
20 Dec 24 ii i  i         i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
23 Dec 24 ii i  i         `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Dec 24 ii i  i          `- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
17 Dec 24 ii i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C4BGB
17 Dec 24 ii i   +* Re: transpiling to low level C2Thiago Adams
18 Dec 24 ii i   i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
21 Dec 24 ii i   `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 ii +* Re: transpiling to low level C76Janis Papanagnou
16 Dec 24 ii i+* Re: transpiling to low level C16bart
16 Dec 24 ii ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C15Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24 ii ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C14bart
17 Dec 24 ii ii  +* Re: transpiling to low level C12Keith Thompson
17 Dec 24 ii ii  i+- Re: transpiling to low level C1BGB
17 Dec 24 ii ii  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C10bart
17 Dec 24 ii ii  i +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24 ii ii  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C6Waldek Hebisch
17 Dec 24 ii ii  i i+* Re: transpiling to low level C4bart
18 Dec 24 ii ii  i ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C3Waldek Hebisch
18 Dec 24 ii ii  i ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C2bart
18 Dec 24 ii ii  i ii  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Waldek Hebisch
18 Dec 24 ii ii  i i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24 ii ii  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Keith Thompson
18 Dec 24 ii ii  i  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
17 Dec 24 ii ii  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 ii i`* Re: transpiling to low level C59Tim Rentsch
21 Dec 24 ii i `* Re: transpiling to low level C58Janis Papanagnou
21 Dec 24 ii i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C3Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24 ii i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Janis Papanagnou
13 Jan 25 ii i  i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
21 Dec 24 ii i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C21Michael S
22 Dec 24 ii i  i+* Re: transpiling to low level C17Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C16Michael S
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C15Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii  `* Re: transpiling to low level C14Michael S
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii   +* Re: transpiling to low level C11Janis Papanagnou
23 Dec 24 ii i  ii   i`* Re: transpiling to low level C10Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24 ii i  ii   i `* Re: transpiling to low level C9Waldek Hebisch
23 Dec 24 ii i  ii   i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C3David Brown
25 Dec 24 ii i  ii   i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2BGB
28 Dec 24 ii i  ii   i  i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
4 Jan 25 ii i  ii   i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C5Tim Rentsch
4 Jan 25 ii i  ii   i   +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jan 25 ii i  ii   i   `* Re: transpiling to low level C3Ben Bacarisse
5 Jan 25 ii i  ii   i    +- Re: transpiling to low level C1James Kuyper
8 Jan 25 ii i  ii   i    `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii   `* Re: transpiling to low level C2James Kuyper
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii    `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Janis Papanagnou
23 Dec 24 ii i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C3Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24 ii i  i `* Re: transpiling to low level C2Chris M. Thomasson
24 Dec 24 ii i  i  `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Dec 24 ii i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C27Waldek Hebisch
22 Dec 24 ii i  i+* Re: transpiling to low level C2Michael S
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii`- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
22 Dec 24 ii i  i+* Re: transpiling to low level C3Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24 ii i  ii`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Waldek Hebisch
4 Jan 25 ii i  ii `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24 ii i  i`* Re: transpiling to low level C21Janis Papanagnou
22 Dec 24 ii i  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C4Michael S
23 Dec 24 ii i  i i+- Re: transpiling to low level C1bart
23 Dec 24 ii i  i i+- Re: transpiling to low level C1Michael S
23 Dec 24 ii i  i i`- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
23 Dec 24 ii i  i +- Re: transpiling to low level C1Waldek Hebisch
23 Dec 24 ii i  i +* Re: transpiling to low level C14David Brown
23 Dec 24 ii i  i `- Re: transpiling to low level C1Tim Rentsch
22 Dec 24 ii i  +* Re: transpiling to low level C2Ben Bacarisse
22 Dec 24 ii i  `* Re: transpiling to low level C4Kaz Kylheku
16 Dec 24 ii `* Re: transpiling to low level C13Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Dec 24 i`* Re: transpiling to low level C2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Feb 25 `* Re: transpiling to low level C2User One

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal