Re: Opinions on `defer`?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Opinions on `defer`?
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 09. Jan 2025, 14:01:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlohbs$3bs33$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 08/01/2025 20:30, Tim Rentsch wrote:
Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> writes:
 
Hi all,
>
"Modern C" author Jens Gustedt has been posting on his blog about a
proposed `defer` feature (as provided by e.g. Zig and Go), the most
recent being:
>
   https://gustedt.wordpress.com/2025/01/06/simple-defer-ready-to-use/
>
What do people here think about having such a feature in C?
 The issue being addressed is one well worth addressing.
 The proposed solution ('defer') is awful.  If this feature is
being considered for the C standard it should be rejected
out of hand.
Jens Gustedt is not just some random C programmer - or even just some random C book author.  He is an active member of the C standards committee, AFAIUI.
You might not agree with his suggested feature, and perhaps the rest of the C standards committee will reject it - that's why there is a committee, so that different ideas and suggestions can be discussed and considered from different viewpoints.
But his suggestion should /not/ be rejected out of hand.  The guy has the qualifications, and done the work, to have the right to be given serious consideration.  If the committee read the proposal, consider it, then reject it, then that's fair enough.
You, on the other hand, can proudly boast the qualification "random guy off the internet with strong opinions" - like most of us here.  When you give an opinion with no justification or reasoning, /that/ opinion can be rejected out of hand.
Give some reasons why you think it is so awful, and why you think your arguments trump those of Jens Gustedt.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Jan 25 * Opinions on `defer`?31Alexis
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Kaz Kylheku
8 Jan 25 i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Thiago Adams
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2David Brown
7 Jan 25 i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Phillip
7 Jan 25 +- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1John McCue
7 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?4Bonita Montero
8 Jan 25 i`* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Chris M. Thomasson
9 Jan 25 i `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Bonita Montero
11 Jan 25 i  `- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
8 Jan 25 +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Janis Papanagnou
8 Jan 25 i+- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Kaz Kylheku
28 Feb 25 i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Jan 25 +- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1BlueManedHawk
8 Jan 25 `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?17Tim Rentsch
8 Jan 25  +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Thiago Adams
8 Jan 25  i+- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Thiago Adams
19 Feb 25  i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Tim Rentsch
9 Jan 25  +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?4David Brown
9 Jan 25  i`* Re: Opinions on `defer`?3Kaz Kylheku
9 Jan 25  i `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2David Brown
9 Jan 25  i  `- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Michael S
9 Jan 25  `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?9Bonita Montero
9 Jan 25   `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?8Bonita Montero
10 Jan 25    +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Bonita Montero
11 Jan 25    i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
10 Jan 25    +- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1David Brown
13 Jan 25    +* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Tim Rentsch
13 Jan 25    i`- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero
24 Feb 25    `* Re: Opinions on `defer`?2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Mar 25     `- Re: Opinions on `defer`?1Bonita Montero

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal