Re: So You Think You Can Const?

On 12/01/2025 23:45, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 12/01/2025 23:29, Waldek Hebisch wrote:

Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> wrote:

Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> writes:

 

I would be happy for you to expand on why you say that.

>
Julio did not want to give his reasons,

 I did give reasons, plenty actually: some people just cannot but keep pretending.
 

Could you try posting them again?  I've looked through your posts here again, and I haven't seen any clear justification for why you think Ben's alternative structure for the code is "more error-prone".  Waldek and I have both given some (very similar) reasons for why /we/ can see the style as potentially error-prone, but we'd like to hear what /your/ reasons are.