Sujet : Re: C23 on MSVC
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 25. Jan 2025, 01:41:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn1bvv$2fink$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 14:06:05 +0200, Michael S wrote:
May be, because majority of additions to the Standard were codifying
existing gcc practice?
Interesting. When I ventured a few months ago in this group that GCC had
become the closest we have to a de-facto-standard C implementation, quite
a few people objected.
Did you know GCC allows nested function definitions, with references to
uplevel locals? I wonder how long it is before that makes it into ANSI/ISO
C ...
BTW, there is nothing wrong with that. In the situation where gcc team
is the only capable team interested in further development of C
language, it is the most logical outcome.
What, no love for LLVM/clang?
C23 on MSVC
Re: C23 on MSVC