Sujet : Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 10. Mar 2025, 15:54:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vqmuec$1cs4o$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/03/2025 14:32, Dan Cross wrote:
<snip>
Topicality is part of the reason the Big-8 guidance for
introducing these discussions recommends cross-posting to groups
where the topic comes up semi-regularly, but setting follow ups
to news.groups.proposals, as I had done, and have done again
here. ;-)
You will no doubt be aware that this discussion has already fragmented over three groups (follow-ups are not everyone's cup of tea). Presumably you will be following the discussion in all of those groups?
-- Richard HeathfieldEmail: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?