Sujet : Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
De : antispam (at) *nospam* fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 02. Apr 2025, 15:12:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <vsjgk0$207gb$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64))
Muttley@dastardlyhq.org wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:57:29 +0100
bart <bc@freeuk.com> wibbled:
On 02/04/2025 06:59, Alexis wrote:
Thought people here might be interested in this image on Jens Gustedt's
blog, which translates section 6.2.5, "Types", of the C23 standard
into a graph of inclusions:
https://gustedt.wordpress.com/2025/03/29/a-diagram-of-c23-basic-types/
>
So much for C being a 'simple' language.
C should be left alone. It does what it needs to do for a systems language.
Almost no use uses it for applications any more and sophisticated processing
using complex types for example are far better done in C++.
C99 has VMT (variable modified types). Thanks to VMT and complex types
C99 can naturaly do numeric computing that previously was done using
Fortran 77. Offical C++ has no VMT. C++ mechanizms look nicer,
but can be less efficient than using VMT-s, so C has advantage for
basic numeric "cores".
-- Waldek Hebisch
| Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
| 23 Apr 26 | … | | | |
Haut de la page
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.
NewsPortal