On 4/2/2025 8:16 AM, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org wrote:To answer my own sarcastic question: No way. :^)On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 14:12:18 -0000 (UTC)All C++ compilers are also C compilers?
antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) wibbled:Muttley@dastardlyhq.org wrote:>On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:57:29 +0100>
bart <bc@freeuk.com> wibbled:On 02/04/2025 06:59, Alexis wrote:>>>
Thought people here might be interested in this image on Jens Gustedt's
blog, which translates section 6.2.5, "Types", of the C23 standard
into a graph of inclusions:
>
https://gustedt.wordpress.com/2025/03/29/a-diagram-of-c23- basic-types/
>
So much for C being a 'simple' language.
C should be left alone. It does what it needs to do for a systems language.
Almost no use uses it for applications any more and sophisticated processing
using complex types for example are far better done in C++.
C99 has VMT (variable modified types). Thanks to VMT and complex types
C99 can naturaly do numeric computing that previously was done using
Fortran 77. Offical C++ has no VMT. C++ mechanizms look nicer,
Officially no, but I've never come across a C++ compiler that didn't support
them given they're all C compilers too.
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 23 Apr 26 |  … |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.