Re: A Famous Security Bug

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: A Famous Security Bug
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 23. Mar 2024, 19:44:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86wmpskcth.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

On 23/03/2024 07:26, James Kuyper wrote:
>
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>
On 22/03/2024 17:14, James Kuyper wrote:
>
[...]
>
If you want to tell a system not only what a program must do, but
also how it must do it, you need to use a lower-level language than
C.
>
Which one?
>
That's up to you.  The point is, C is NOT that language.
>
I'm asking which /mainstream/ HLL is lower level than C. So
specifically ruling out assembly.
>
If there is no such choice, then this is the problem:  it has to be C
or nothing.

If it has to be C or nothing, then it's nothing.  Some people might
not like that, but that's the way it is.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Mar 24 * Re: A Famous Security Bug52James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 `* Re: A Famous Security Bug51bart
23 Mar 24  +* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Keith Thompson
23 Mar 24  i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24  i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
23 Mar 24  i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2bart
24 Mar 24  i   `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
23 Mar 24  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug45James Kuyper
23 Mar 24   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug44bart
23 Mar 24    +* Re: A Famous Security Bug37David Brown
23 Mar 24    i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug36bart
24 Mar 24    i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug29David Brown
24 Mar 24    i i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug28bart
24 Mar 24    i i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug12Keith Thompson
24 Mar 24    i i i+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24    i i i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i ii+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24    i i ii`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
25 Mar 24    i i i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug7bart
25 Mar 24    i i i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i i  +* Re: A Famous Security Bug4bart
25 Mar 24    i i i  i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
25 Mar 24    i i i  i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Malcolm McLean
25 Mar 24    i i i  i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24    i i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug15David Brown
25 Mar 24    i i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug14Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug13David Brown
25 Mar 24    i i    +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i    i+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24    i i    i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1bart
25 Mar 24    i i    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug9bart
25 Mar 24    i i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug7Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i     i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug6bart
25 Mar 24    i i     i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24    i i     i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Michael S
25 Mar 24    i i     i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3bart
26 Mar 24    i i     i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Michael S
26 Mar 24    i i     i    `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1bart
25 Mar 24    i i     `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24    i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6Michael S
24 Mar 24    i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5bart
25 Mar 24    i   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Michael S
25 Mar 24    i   i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
25 Mar 24    i   +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
28 Mar 24    i   `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
23 Mar 24    +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Tim Rentsch
24 Mar 24    +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
24 Mar 24    +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
24 Mar 24    i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug2bart
24 Mar 24    i `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
28 Mar 24    `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal