Sujet : Re: remark on defining size of basic types
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 05. Apr 2024, 03:56:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <uunp8q$3del2$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
uundl9$ugsb$2@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 15:15:26 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>
Sometimes it's useful to have an unbounded or parameterized integral
data type available ...
>
Interestingly, Fortran (of all things) has that.
GAWK has it (*) - when run with -M.
(*) Or at least it did. Latest scuttlebut is they might be removing it.
-- Modern Conservative: Someone who can take time out from flashing herwedding ring around and bragging about her honeymoon to complain that afellow secretary who keeps a picture of her girlfriend on her desk is"flauting her sexuality" and "forcing her lifestyle down our throats".
remark on defining size of basic types
Re: remark on defining size of basic types