Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 03. Jun 2024, 04:15:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3jcgf$3ntcs$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
On Thu, 30 May 2024 00:40:07 -0400, Paul wrote:

WSL uses containers, so of course it is slow.

WSL1 had a Linux “personality” on top of the NT kernel. So this was
emulation, not containers.

WSL2 uses Hyper-V to run Linux inside a VM. Again, not containers.

Linux has containers, which are based entirely on namespace isolation (and
cgroups for process management). These are all standard kernel mechanisms,
so there should be very little overhead in using them.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jun 24 * Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun 24 +* Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
3 Jun 24 i`- Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun 24 `* Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions3Michael S
3 Jun 24  +- Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions1Paul
4 Jun 24  `- Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal