Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 04. Jun 2024, 09:01:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240604110156.0000379c@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:07:59 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:39:55 +0200, Bonita Montero wrote:
 
MSVC quitted compilation after allocating 50GB of
memory, gcc and clang compiled for minutes. 
 
Next time, don’t even bother with MSVC.

For smaller file (but still much bigger than what is likely to be
encountered in practice, 155 MB binary, 641 MB after conversion to
text) MSVC was both ~1.5x faster than gcc and had lower peak memory
consumption.
And that was a "new", slow MSVC. "Old", faster MSVC should fare even
better, if I ever dare to install it on computer with enough RAM.




Date Sujet#  Auteur
3 Jun 24 * Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions8Bonita Montero
4 Jun 24 +* Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jun 24 i+* Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions3Bonita Montero
4 Jun 24 ii`* Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jun 24 ii `- Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
4 Jun 24 i`* Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions2Michael S
4 Jun 24 i `- Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions1Bonita Montero
4 Jun 24 `- Re: xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions1Paul

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal