AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 05. Jun 2024, 17:51:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240605195159.00002f0e@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:58:46 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:

Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
 
 
I couldn't get the AES-based hash function to compile.  There
was a complaint about not being able to inline an 'always-inline'
function.  I played around with it for a while but didn't get
anywhere.
 

Not that using my reference hash is particularly important (I needed it
as a quick way to get something I could rely on; you already have
something else with similar properties) but it's still worth
investigation.

There are two possibilities:
1. gcc compiler's -march=native logic incorrectly detects CPU type on
your computer.
2. you CPU really does not support AES instructions.

If the former, you can force compiler's hand with -maes flag.
If the later, then you can compile it, but wouldn't be able to run my
"reference" hash function on this particular computer

What CPU are you using?




Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jun 24 * Re: Good hash for pointers32Michael S
5 Jun 24 +* Re: Good hash for pointers4Bonita Montero
5 Jun 24 i`* Re: Good hash for pointers3Michael S
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: Good hash for pointers2Bonita Montero
5 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Michael S
5 Jun 24 +* Re: Good hash for pointers17Tim Rentsch
5 Jun 24 i+* AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)2Michael S
6 Jun 24 ii`- Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)1Tim Rentsch
5 Jun 24 i+* Re: Good hash for pointers11Michael S
6 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Good hash for pointers10Tim Rentsch
6 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Good hash for pointers9Michael S
17 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: Good hash for pointers8Tim Rentsch
17 Jun 24 ii   `* Re: Good hash for pointers7Michael S
18 Jun 24 ii    `* Re: Good hash for pointers6Tim Rentsch
18 Jun 24 ii     +* Re: Good hash for pointers2Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 ii     i`- Re: Good hash for pointers1Tim Rentsch
19 Jun 24 ii     `* Re: Good hash for pointers3James Kuyper
19 Jun 24 ii      +- Re: Good hash for pointers1Keith Thompson
23 Jun 24 ii      `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Tim Rentsch
6 Jun 24 i`* Re: Good hash for pointers3Michael S
16 Jun 24 i `* Re: Good hash for pointers2Tim Rentsch
16 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jun 24 `* Re: Good hash for pointers10Bonita Montero
9 Jun 24  `* Re: Good hash for pointers9Bonita Montero
9 Jun 24   +* Re: Good hash for pointers2Richard Harnden
9 Jun 24   i`- Re: Good hash for pointers1Bonita Montero
10 Jun 24   `* Re: Good hash for pointers6Malcolm McLean
10 Jun 24    +* Re: Good hash for pointers4Tim Rentsch
10 Jun 24    i`* Re: Good hash for pointers3Michael S
10 Jun 24    i +- Re: Good hash for pointers1Bonita Montero
16 Jun 24    i `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Tim Rentsch
10 Jun 24    `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Bonita Montero

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal