Sujet : Re: Good hash for pointers
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 05. Jun 2024, 17:59:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240605195905.00002484@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:58:46 -0700
Tim Rentsch <
tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
I did get your own hash function out and put it into my little
test rig. There may be summary comments below.
<snip>
As you probably already paid attention, I like bottom lines.
What is a bottom line here?
Did you you encounter cases in which almost-bonita's-but-not-quite
hash function performed badly?
Re: Good hash for pointers
Re: Good hash for pointers