Re: C23 thoughts and opinions

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : cr88192 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (BGB)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 05. Jun 2024, 19:49:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3qc01$12ubj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/5/2024 8:29 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> writes:
On 6/4/2024 2:21 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> writes:
On 6/3/2024 3:23 PM, Tim Rentsch wrote:
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>
[ ... (internal-combustion) engines, ... ]
>
It's pretty clear that the ICE is becoming a dinosaur.
>
Kind of makes it full circle, doesn't it?  ;)
>
Though, annoyingly, there isn't a great alternative in some use cases:
    Batteries: Lower energy density and require charging (slow);
>
Both of which are an order of magnitude better than just a
decade ago - and both energy density and charge time are
a subject of intense research (both in the automotive
and aircraft industries).  I fully expect that energy density
per kilogram will be more than doubled in the next decade.
>
>
Still pretty far tough to catch up with Ethanol or Gasoline, where it is
also many orders of magnitude faster to refill a fuel tank than to
charge a battery, ...
 Many orders of magnitude?  5 minutes (petrol) vs. 20 minutes
(supercharger to 80%)?   And you can expect the latter to decrease
with time while the former has actually increased in the past few
decades (it used to be faster before self-service pumps were
developed).
 
>
IIRC, there aren't many battery technologies that can manage a charge
rate much over 1C to 3C (so, getting a recharge time much under ~ 20
minutes or so is unlikely).
 Actually, here's where we're going on charge time:
 https://www.fastcompany.com/91016543/scientists-just-invented-an-ev-battery-that-can-fully-charge-in-5-minutes
 
>
>
>
Vs, say, refilling something like a car in ~ 25 seconds or so at a fuel
pump (but, could potentially be made faster if needed). Though, there
are likely to be limits here short of redesigning the mechanical interface.
 Come now, it's more like 5 minutes rather than 25 seconds (that is
almost a gallon a second).   Not likely to find those types of speeds
in a self-serve gas station - just for safety sake if nothing else).
 
In a lot of the gas stations I have seen, it doesn't seem like 5 minutes, often more like half a minute.
Granted, not sure the size of the gas tank in the car.
At a "standard" pump speed (~ 9 gal/min), this would imply 4 or 5 gallons or so (from around a half-tank), so maybe a 10 gallon tank?...
Looks it up: Yeah, the car in this case is a 10 gallon tank...
Something like 5 minutes would imply one is filling a roughly 45 gallon tank that was entirely empty (or 90 gallons at half-full).
I would assume a typical car doesn't have one quite so large...
When it still worked, the fuel-economy display was generally around 40 mpg or so.
...

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jun 24 * Re: C23 thoughts and opinions37Lynn McGuire
1 Jun 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3David Brown
1 Jun 24 i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Malcolm McLean
2 Jun 24 i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jun 24 `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions33Michael S
2 Jun 24  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions23David Brown
2 Jun 24  i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions22Michael S
2 Jun 24  i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions21David Brown
3 Jun 24  i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions20Michael S
3 Jun 24  i   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions19David Brown
3 Jun 24  i    +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
3 Jun 24  i    +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions16Michael S
4 Jun 24  i    i+- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Kaz Kylheku
4 Jun 24  i    i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions11Kaz Kylheku
4 Jun 24  i    ii+- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
4 Jun 24  i    ii+- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
4 Jun 24  i    ii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions8BGB
4 Jun 24  i    ii +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2BGB-Alt
5 Jun 24  i    ii i`- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jun 24  i    ii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jun 24  i    ii  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4BGB
7 Jun 24  i    ii   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
7 Jun 24  i    ii    `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2BGB
14 Jun 24  i    ii     `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jun 24  i    i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Jun 24  i    i +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Dan Cross
7 Jun 24  i    i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 Jun 24  i    `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Jun 24  +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jun 24  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Jun 24   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
3 Jun 24   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions6Tim Rentsch
4 Jun 24    `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5BGB
5 Jun 24     `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4BGB
5 Jun 24      +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Paul
5 Jun 24      i`- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1BGB
5 Jun 24      `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1BGB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal