Sujet : Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
De : bc (at) *nospam* freeuk.com (bart)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 07. Jun 2024, 22:23:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3vtou$27sqi$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 07/06/2024 01:55, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 19:38:08 +0100, bart wrote:
Sorry, I've lost track of what it is you are trying to prove. That
everything is a linker?
You were the one trying to prove that linkerless programming was a good
idea, or something. And then you tried to distract attention from the
weakness of your arguments by bringing Python into it.
Not working out so well now, is it?
For me it's working brilliantly. I have two native code compilers that don't use a traditional linker:
* A C compiler with independently compiled modules
* A non-C compiler with whole-program compilation
It's you who can't get your head around the idea that someone could be away with a 'linker'.
Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
Re: C23 thoughts and opinions