Re: Good hash for pointers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Good hash for pointers
De : malcolm.arthur.mclean (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Malcolm McLean)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 10. Jun 2024, 01:34:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v45hmd$3t9dq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 09/06/2024 12:35, Bonita Montero wrote:

 uint64_t MichaelsHash( uint64_t key )
{
     __m128i xkey = _mm_set_epi64x( key, 42 );
     using bar_t = pair<uint64_t, uint64_t>;
     static bar_t const bars[8] =
     {
         { 0xBB09BBCC90B24BF2, 0x825C622FF2792A01 },
         { 0x94F0535CB06D4060, 0x939C756246DBFD1D },
         { 0x5B835E01A7E14CA1, 0xAC2BDAFC023CDD06 },
         { 0xE0B6A4735B774AEC, 0x9CAFB43E7DDE494C },
     };
     for( bar_t const &bar : bars )
         xkey = _mm_aesenc_si128( xkey, _mm_set_epi64x( bar.second, bar.first ) );
     return xkey.m128i_u64[0];
}
 Now the code is about six times faster and I get a eight times
speedup over single-threaded processing with the same code. Of
course the results are still the same.
Thank you.
I have your permission to drop that in?
--
Check out my hobby project.
http://malcolmmclean.github.io/babyxrc

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jun 24 * Re: Good hash for pointers32Michael S
5 Jun 24 +* Re: Good hash for pointers4Bonita Montero
5 Jun 24 i`* Re: Good hash for pointers3Michael S
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: Good hash for pointers2Bonita Montero
5 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Michael S
5 Jun 24 +* Re: Good hash for pointers17Tim Rentsch
5 Jun 24 i+* AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)2Michael S
6 Jun 24 ii`- Re: AES problem (was: Good hash for pointers)1Tim Rentsch
5 Jun 24 i+* Re: Good hash for pointers11Michael S
6 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Good hash for pointers10Tim Rentsch
6 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Good hash for pointers9Michael S
17 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: Good hash for pointers8Tim Rentsch
17 Jun 24 ii   `* Re: Good hash for pointers7Michael S
18 Jun 24 ii    `* Re: Good hash for pointers6Tim Rentsch
18 Jun 24 ii     +* Re: Good hash for pointers2Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 ii     i`- Re: Good hash for pointers1Tim Rentsch
19 Jun 24 ii     `* Re: Good hash for pointers3James Kuyper
19 Jun 24 ii      +- Re: Good hash for pointers1Keith Thompson
23 Jun 24 ii      `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Tim Rentsch
6 Jun 24 i`* Re: Good hash for pointers3Michael S
16 Jun 24 i `* Re: Good hash for pointers2Tim Rentsch
16 Jun 24 i  `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Jun 24 `* Re: Good hash for pointers10Bonita Montero
9 Jun 24  `* Re: Good hash for pointers9Bonita Montero
9 Jun 24   +* Re: Good hash for pointers2Richard Harnden
9 Jun 24   i`- Re: Good hash for pointers1Bonita Montero
10 Jun 24   `* Re: Good hash for pointers6Malcolm McLean
10 Jun 24    +* Re: Good hash for pointers4Tim Rentsch
10 Jun 24    i`* Re: Good hash for pointers3Michael S
10 Jun 24    i +- Re: Good hash for pointers1Bonita Montero
16 Jun 24    i `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Tim Rentsch
10 Jun 24    `- Re: Good hash for pointers1Bonita Montero

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal