Sujet : Re: Good hash for pointers
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 23. Jun 2024, 19:23:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86v81zfrhv.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
James Kuyper <
jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
...
>
I see. So it isn't that you think "ANSI C" is wrong, just
that it might be misleading or that C89 or C90 is preferable.
>
ANSI's documentation is quite clear about the fact that there is, at any
time, only one ANSI C standard, [...]
I'm not talking about ANSI's documentation. I'm talking about
how people use the term ANSI C.
Re: Good hash for pointers
Re: Good hash for pointers