Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 29. Aug 2024, 22:02:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20240829230246.00001487@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:59:49 -0700
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:

Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
On 29.08.2024 04:07, Janis Papanagnou wrote: 
On 29.08.2024 02:04, Keith Thompson wrote: 
>
If there's an easy way to type non-ASCII characters like '·' that
works across different systems, including all the various terminal
emulators used on Windows and Linux (as well as MacOS, but I don't
happen to use it), I'd love to know about it.  
 
I don't think there can be a portable or consistent way to create
that character. Incidentally (I just tried a few keys) I can get
the '·' by typing "Alt GR" and ',' (on my DE keyboard). [...] 
>
Keith, what does your keyboard produce when typing <Alt>-<7> ?
>
On my US keyboard it produces the '·'. Don't know whether that
is reliable, though. (I don't think it is; e.g. my Thunderbird
doesn't expand any character when entering <Alt> combinations.) 
 
It produces the two-character sequence Escape 7.
 

Which 7? The one on numeric pad produces • in quite a lot of contexts.
The character appears after release of Alt key.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Aug 24 * about some potentially interesting unicode operators24fir
28 Aug 24 +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators21Blue-Maned_Hawk
28 Aug 24 i+* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators17Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24 ii+- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Keith Thompson
29 Aug 24 ii`* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 ii `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators14Keith Thompson
29 Aug 24 ii  +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators10Janis Papanagnou
29 Aug 24 ii  i`* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators9Janis Papanagnou
29 Aug 24 ii  i `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators8Keith Thompson
29 Aug 24 ii  i  `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators7Michael S
29 Aug 24 ii  i   +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators2Michael S
30 Aug 24 ii  i   i`- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Michael S
29 Aug 24 ii  i   `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators4Keith Thompson
30 Aug 24 ii  i    `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Aug 24 ii  i     `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators2Keith Thompson
31 Aug 24 ii  i      `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 ii  +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Otto J. Makela
29 Aug 24 ii  `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1David Brown
29 Aug 24 i`* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 i +- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Janis Papanagnou
29 Aug 24 i `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1fir
29 Aug 24 +- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Sep 24 `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal