Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators
De : om (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Otto J. Makela)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 23. Oct 2024, 16:05:07
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Games and Theory
Message-ID : <8734kmgbjg.fsf@tigger.extechop.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 17:04:46 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
There is no "Compose" key on the keyboard I'm using to type this.
>
Remember, you can assign your own keys on *nix GUIs.
>
I use Caps Lock for this purpose.

I've repurposed the bottom row "menu" key on my keyboard,
since the Mate window manager I use really doesn't require it.

People who use non-English languages typically have keyboards with
accented letters and so forth.
>
As I have mentioned before, the idea that only “non-English languages”
needs such symbols demonstrates a certain ... naïveté.

I like using compose - > to produce "→" and compose . . for "…"
even when I'm writing English.

--
   /* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
  /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
 /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27,  FI-00100 Helsinki */
/* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
28 Aug 24 * about some potentially interesting unicode operators24fir
28 Aug 24 +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators21Blue-Maned_Hawk
28 Aug 24 i+* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators17Keith Thompson
28 Aug 24 ii+- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Keith Thompson
29 Aug 24 ii`* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators15Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 ii `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators14Keith Thompson
29 Aug 24 ii  +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators10Janis Papanagnou
29 Aug 24 ii  i`* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators9Janis Papanagnou
29 Aug 24 ii  i `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators8Keith Thompson
29 Aug 24 ii  i  `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators7Michael S
29 Aug 24 ii  i   +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators2Michael S
30 Aug 24 ii  i   i`- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Michael S
29 Aug 24 ii  i   `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators4Keith Thompson
30 Aug 24 ii  i    `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Aug 24 ii  i     `* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators2Keith Thompson
31 Aug 24 ii  i      `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 ii  +* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 Oct 24 ii  i`- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Otto J. Makela
29 Aug 24 ii  `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1David Brown
29 Aug 24 i`* Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Aug 24 i +- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Janis Papanagnou
29 Aug 24 i `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1fir
29 Aug 24 +- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
5 Sep 24 `- Re: about some potentially interesting unicode operators1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal