Sujet : Re: 80386 C compiler
De : mutazilah (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Paul Edwards)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 25. Nov 2024, 00:46:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vi0dt1$2el7m$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
"Janis Papanagnou" <janis_papanagnou+
ng@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:vhvsm9$2bmq9$1@dont-email.me...On 24.11.2024 15:00, Paul Edwards wrote:
>
I have been after a public domain C compiler for decades.
[...] I'm after C90 written in C90.
>
Why formulate the latter condition if you can bootstrap?
(Did you mean; written in a "C" not more recent than C90?)
Yes - written in C90 so that it can be maintained with
just knowledge of C90.
And also written in C90 so that it is written naturally
for a C90 programmer, not using a subset of C90
(like SubC written on the assumption that "struct"
doesn't exist).
BFN. Paul.