Sujet : Re: question about linker
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 04. Dec 2024, 17:04:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86ed2nmo2c.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Kaz Kylheku <
643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
A hand written recursive descent parser will have the best tooling.
Recursive descent parsers work well for some classes of
context-free grammars. Other context-free grammars, not
so much.
A hand written recursive descent parser might have better
tooling than any table-driven parser for the same language.
Then again, it might not, depending on how it was written,
and what table-driven alternatives are available.