Re: question about linker

On 04/12/2024 23:09, Keith Thompson wrote:

Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]

My language is intended for whole program compilation. There are no
interfaces between modules (that is, a file listing the exports of a
module, separately from the implementation).

 Since you keep telling us about your language,

Someone raised a point about it, and I replied.
  I have a few questions:

 What is it called?  (I'm assuming it has a name.)
 Is there an implementation that others can use?
 Is there a specification?

There were specs, docs, binaries in the past, even versions that could be built from a C rendering of the source code.
I no longer do that. The support is just too much. My health is not great, and I can guarantee nothing.
Besides few people are interested in this kind of low-level language; they're mostly into modern alternatives.
The people who like C, will find it too different (and most work on Linux).  Plus they expect tooling, community, libraries etc.
If you're actually interested in what it looks like, I can give some links but they're out of date (it's constantly being tweaked).

Would you consider supporting the creation of a new alt.comp.lang.<name>
newsgroup where people who are actually interested in it can discuss it?
 

No. It would be an empty wasteland.
Somebody did try to put it on Rosetta Code, under the name Mosaic. I call it just 'M'.