Re: question about linker

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: question about linker
De : already5chosen (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (Michael S)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 11. Dec 2024, 10:18:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20241211111856.00005d14@yahoo.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 05:37:15 -0000 (UTC)
antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) wrote:

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
On 30/11/2024 18:38, Bart wrote: 
It will at least work with more compiles.
 
 
And why would that matter?  No actual developer would care if their
code can be compiled by your little toy compiler, or even more
complete little tools like tcc.  Code needs to work on the
compilers that are suitable for the job - compatibility with
anything else would just be a waste of effort and missing out on
useful features that makes the code better. 
 
You are exagerating and that does not help communication.  In this
group there were at least one serious poster claiming to write code
depending only on features from older C standard. 

For some definition of "serious".

People like this
presumably would care if some "toy" compiler discoverd non-compliance.
Concerning tcc, they have explicit endorsment from gawk developer:
he likes compile speed and says that gawk compiles fine using tcc.
 
In may coding I use gcc extentions when I feel that there is
substantial gain.  But for significant part of my code I prefer
to portablility, and that may include avoiding features not
supported by lesser compilers.  I the past tcc was not able
to compile code which I consider rather ordinary C, and due
to this and lack of support for my main target I did not use
tcc.  But tcc improved, ATM I do not know if it is good enough
for me, but it passed initial tests, so I have no reason to
disregard it.
 
BTW: IME "exotic" tools and targets help with finding bugs.
So even if you do not normally need to compile with some
compiler it makes sense to check if it works.
 

I would think that the main reason for David Brown's absence of
interest in tcc is simply because tcc do not have back ends for
targets that he cares about.
In particular, Arm port appears to be abandoned in 2003, so quite
likely tcc can't generate code that runs on MCUs with ARMv7-M
architecture that happens to be released first in the same year and
officially named in the 2004.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Nov 24 * question about linker383Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 +* Re: question about linker16Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: question about linker15Bart
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: question about linker14Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker2BGB
27 Nov 24 i  i`- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker5David Brown
27 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: question about linker4Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i  i +* Re: question about linker2David Brown
27 Nov 24 i  i i`- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
2 Dec 24 i  i `- Re: question about linker1BGB
27 Nov 24 i  `* Re: question about linker6Michael S
27 Nov 24 i   `* Re: question about linker5Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i    `* Re: question about linker4Michael S
27 Nov 24 i     +- Re: question about linker1David Brown
28 Nov 24 i     +- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
2 Dec 24 i     `- Re: question about linker1BGB
26 Nov 24 +* Re: question about linker20Bart
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: question about linker19Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: question about linker18Bart
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker3BGB
27 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: question about linker2fir
27 Nov 24 i  i `- Re: question about linker1BGB
27 Nov 24 i  `* Re: question about linker14Bart
27 Nov 24 i   +* Re: question about linker12Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i+- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: question about linker10Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i +* Re: question about linker6Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i i`* Re: question about linker5Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i +* Re: question about linker3Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i i`* Re: question about linker2Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i i `- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i i `- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i `* Re: question about linker3Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i  `* Re: question about linker2Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i   `- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24 i   `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
27 Nov 24 `* Re: question about linker346Waldek Hebisch
27 Nov 24  `* Re: question about linker345Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24   `* Re: question about linker344Keith Thompson
28 Nov 24    `* Re: question about linker343Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24     +* Re: question about linker338Bart
28 Nov 24     i`* Re: question about linker337Keith Thompson
28 Nov 24     i `* Re: question about linker336Bart
28 Nov 24     i  `* Re: question about linker335Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i   `* Re: question about linker334Bart
29 Nov 24     i    +* Re: question about linker3Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i    i`* Re: question about linker2Bart
29 Nov 24     i    i `- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i    `* Re: question about linker330David Brown
29 Nov 24     i     `* Re: question about linker329Bart
29 Nov 24     i      +- Re: question about linker1Ike Naar
29 Nov 24     i      +* Re: question about linker326Michael S
29 Nov 24     i      i+* Re: question about linker323Bart
29 Nov 24     i      ii`* Re: question about linker322Michael S
29 Nov 24     i      ii +* Re: question about linker320David Brown
29 Nov 24     i      ii i`* Re: question about linker319Bart
29 Nov 24     i      ii i +* Re: question about linker165Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i      ii i i`* Re: question about linker164Bart
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i `* Re: question about linker163Keith Thompson
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +* Re: question about linker95Waldek Hebisch
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  i+- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  i+* Re: question about linker3James Kuyper
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  ii`* Re: question about linker2Michael S
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  ii `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i`* Re: question about linker90David Brown
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i +* Re: question about linker88Bart
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i`* Re: question about linker87David Brown
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i `* Re: question about linker86Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i  `* Re: question about linker85David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i   `* Re: question about linker84Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    +* Re: question about linker78David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    i+* Re: question about linker72Janis Papanagnou
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    ii+* Re: question about linker70Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iii+* Re: question about linker68David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii`* Re: question about linker67Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii `* Re: question about linker66David Brown
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  +* Re: question about linker53Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i`* Re: question about linker52David Brown
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i `* Re: question about linker51Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i  `* Re: question about linker50David Brown
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i   `* Re: question about linker49Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i    `* Re: question about linker48David Brown
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     +* Re: question about linker24Bart
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i`* Re: question about linker23David Brown
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i +- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i `* Re: question about linker21Bart
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i  `* Re: question about linker20David Brown
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i   `* Re: question about linker19Bart
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    +* Re: question about linker5Ike Naar
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i+- Re: question about linker1Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i+- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i`* Re: question about linker2Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i `- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    +* Re: question about linker10David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i`* Re: question about linker9Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i `* Re: question about linker8David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i  `* Re: question about linker7Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i   `* Re: question about linker6David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i    `* Re: question about linker5Bart
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i     +* Re: question about linker3Ben Bacarisse
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i     `- Re: question about linker1David Brown
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    `* Re: question about linker3Waldek Hebisch
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     +* Re: question about linker15Waldek Hebisch
11 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     `* Re: question about linker8James Kuyper
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  `* Re: question about linker12Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iii`- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    ii`- Re: question about linker1Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    i`* Re: question about linker5Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    `* Re: question about linker5Waldek Hebisch
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i `- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +* Re: question about linker44Bart
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  `* Re: question about linker22David Brown
30 Nov 24     i      ii i `* Re: question about linker153David Brown
5 Dec 24     i      ii `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
30 Nov 24     i      i`* Re: question about linker2Tim Rentsch
29 Nov 24     i      `- Re: question about linker1David Brown
28 Nov 24     `* Re: question about linker4Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal