Sujet : Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?)
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 08. Jan 2025, 20:52:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86jzb584nn.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Phillip <
nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> writes:
C89 and C90 are better for 8-bit systems then C99 and newer. Not
that you can't do 8-bit on C99 but it's just not designed as well
for it since C99 assumes you've moved on to at least 16-bit.
Which parts of the C99 standard support this assertion?