Sujet : Re: C90 fpeek
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 26. Jan 2025, 00:55:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn3tmd$35e2n$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 10:58:32 +1100, Paul Edwards wrote:
You could argue that if I'm willing to add ANSI X3.64,
why not also add C23 and POSIX and ...
I don't have a good answer to that, other than I'm trying to keep
movement away from C90 to a minimum.
Let me suggest a more reasonable baseline for code that is to be minimally
relevant to this century: C99 + POSIX.
C90 fpeek
Re: C90 fpeek