bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
On 28/02/2025 10:19, Richard Heathfield wrote:On 28/02/2025 09:21, Janis Papanagnou wrote:On 28.02.2025 09:55, Richard Heathfield wrote:<snip>On the other hand, I maxed out at 24.>
It would be interesting to get to know what sort of code-lines
or what sort of code-structure these extreme values stem from.
I thought so too, so I looked, and of course it's not as
interesting as we might have hoped.
I'm not allowed to post the code here, but I can paraphrase:
value = really_quite_extremely_long_function_name(arg1,
arg2,
arg3,
arg4);
<sigh>
I think I'd go with this:
value = really_quite_extremely_long_function_name(
arg1,
arg2,
arg3,
arg4);
Same here. Except that I'd use even smaller indentation.
But not for printf(). For printf I prefer
printf("short format %d+%d+%d=%d\n"
,arg1
,arg2
,arg3
,arg4
);
When format string is longer I put it on the separate line as well.
Since the args would then also line up with a similar call but where
the function name is a different length:
value2 = a_somewhat_shorter_function_name(
arg1,
arg2,
arg3,
arg4);
That's assuming it is still not viable to have them all on the same
line.
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 28 Mar 26 |  … |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.